FatCat's Money Confessions

FatCat's MoneyConfessions - helping you save (& make) money, one click at a time

Variable Interest, Fixed Interest or both. Whats the best in the current climate???

I have been lucky enough to be able to have bought my first home in the right time. But as the decreasing interest rates have now stalled and all indications from the media saying they are on the up soon, what is the best scenario to be in? Fix in 100% of my loan, partially fix the loan(what is best mix e.g. 40% fixed/60% Variable), or ride the rollercoaster of the lower variable?

My feelings are to partially fix the loan so i can "hedge my bets" and try to save money, but i just dont know how much to fix. What would be the "norm" for most of the average sized home loans in the period we are facing right now?

Tags: ., Interest, Rates, home loans, loans

Views: 17

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think I would be inclined to go for it and fix the majority of your loan. I do not think interest rates will go lower. I would consider fixing 60 - 75% of the loan. The prob with fixing your loan is that you cannot pay it off any quicker therefore I would not fix 100%. I am a firm believer in leaving some wiggle room just in case some extra money does appear or in a worse case scenario you can always alter the variable bit to interest only.

This is based on you having continuing employment or some other constant income stream that will allow you to safely service your loan and bear in mind I am just a punter like yourself and not a finance professional.
Hello Sharmo

My thoughts are mostly based on pobability.

The probability that rates go down is low and the probability they will go down lots is lower.

The probability they will go up, in the near future is medium to high and the probability for a large rise is at least medium.

Also the banks are moving the fixed rates to around the long term average. They will do this ahead of expected rises. People say they will move to fixed when the variable moves up, by then the banks will have covered themselves by moving up the fixed rates.

I have locked in the majority of my borrowing for 3 years at what I consider a good rate

Ultimately the choice comes down to what makes you comfortable

As with Jacquest I am a general punter and my comments should not be seen as financial advice.
I'm with Bandwidth on this one - I reckon the probability of rates going down is next to nothing, however there is a chance that they could spike up.

Although Jacquesk is right about you being able to pay off the variable portion without being penalised, note that if rates go up, you'll be able to pay out your fixed loan without penalty.The bank WANTS you to break out of a low interest rate loan. You used to actually get a payment from the bank if variable rates were significantly higher than the fixed rate you were breaking out of, but I think they did away with that.

JFK
Exactly! That is why you would fix a sizable portion of your loan. Lets say you locked in 75% of your loan into a fixed rate. If interest rates go up then the portion locked in at the lower rate (75%) is unaffected. The portion that remained on the variable rate (25%) is affected but you are only paying the higher interest rate on that portion.

With the variable portion of the loan you can pay it off quicker (if you have extra funds). This to me is the argument and main advantage for keeping part of your loan as variable.

As I said in the earlier post another advantage of the variable portion (or a variable loan for that matter) is that if things go bad like losing a job etc then you (if your lender agrees) can convert to paying interest only.

A friend of mine who became unemployed recently did this until she found another job.

RSS

Latest Activity

peter randle is now a member of FatCat's Money Confessions
Thursday
Bankruptcy ben replied to Stephen's discussion How to Cancel a Part IX Debt Agreement
"Hi I work for a Debt Agreement administrator. There are 3 ways to end a debt agreement, you pay it out in full, you can apply to have the agreement terminated (however interest backdates from the start of your agreement), or you can offer to make a…"
May 8
Cliff Mearns replied to Cliff Mearns's discussion Bankruptcy -v Debt Agreement
"Ben, let's not lose the loop. How financiers view bankruptcy is not relevant to the discussion of an individual's capacity to pay something. Bankruptcy is being utilised as a means of evading debt obligations. "
May 8
Bankruptcy ben replied to Cliff Mearns's discussion Bankruptcy -v Debt Agreement
"I agree with the setiment however in reality there's nothing to encourage an individual to make a payment with a Debt Agreement! While technically it's different most financial companies regard it as the same as bankruptcy."
May 8

FatCat news

Is The Bible The Ultimate Financial Guide?

Maybe it's time to go back to Sunday school.

What makes entrepreneurs successful?

By being hardworking entrepreneurs, we all have the opportunity to be very successful.

How Asia Survives A Sinking Euro

At this point, it is best for investors to prepare for a worst case scenario.

How To Build A Successful Career As A Published Writer

Perhaps the most important trait for any writer is die-hard determination.

5 Tips for Launching a Volunteer Program

Organizations come in all shapes and sizes but when it comes to giving back to the community there's a common path to success.

Badge

Loading…

© 2012   Created by FatCat.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service