One-tenth of Australians live in the most affluent suburbs.
But whereas traditionally Australia’s wealthiest areas have been confined to capital cities now, thanks to the mining boom, remote regions also have their own “rich” neighbourhoods - in mining towns of northern WA and mid-east Qld.
This info comes from the AMP.NATSEM Income and Wealth Report. The data shows definite trends. But if I was seriously wealthy I’m not sure that I’d fit any of the scenarios.
Would you up stakes if you suddenly came into money? If so, where would you build/buy your dream home?
I’d probably shift to the NSW north coast for at least half the year. But ironically the report found that the east coast of Australia, in particular northern NSW beaches (Port Macquarie and Coffs Harbour and inland) to be areas of low income.
Are you surprised to learn this? I was.
That means that those undergoing a “seachange” from
Sydney to the NSW north coast are moving into areas of lower income.
Most of the high-income areas are in capital cities. Canberra fared the best, with the fewest poorer areas and the most affluent areas of any capital city. Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane have significant pockets of high-income areas, with buffers of moderate-income areas before the poorer areas. Adelaide has a mix of rich and poor areas. Perth has no areas in the bottom low-income bracket. Conversely Tasmania has no area in the highest income decile.
Tags: goal, property, trends, wealth
-
▶ Reply to This